5.13.2005

mother, father—what is sex?

Sex is mysterious, doubly so for children. We teach our children to read, we teach them to write. We answer their many, many questions about how the world works; however, when it comes to sex, we leave our children in the dark. Questions go unanswered, ultimately leading to an increased curiosity and yearning to reveal the puzzling nature of sex. It is this lack of knowledge that our youngsters are left with regarding sex that causes an infatuation with it. If we were to refuse to answer questions youths have about trains, they would become increasingly fascinated with trains. This is the nature of curiosity. For sex this phenomenon is even more pronounced, because while trains are quite boring, sex is nothing short of intriguing.

There is absolutely no excuse for deceiving children, no matter the topic. We must answer their questions regarding sex openly and honestly. There is no need for any sort of peculiar overtone when speaking with a child about these matters. Speak frankly and thoroughly. A child has not yet been exposed to the notion that sex is somehow “off limits.” If we explain the purpose of the penis and the vagina, as we explain the purpose of books and calculators, neither will be more mysterious than the other. A healthy sex life will arise out of children with this type of clear understanding.

Furthermore, once we begin lying to our youths about sex, they lose faith in our informative reliability on the whole. We must not mislead them about one topic, lest we lose their confidence on a host of other topics as well. They will begin to go elsewhere for information regarding sex or whatever else, in order to satisfy their fascination with issues that are left unexplained.

We should also not deceive our children into believing that monogamous relationships are the only ones that exist. There should be no stories about everyone remaining virgins until their marriage night. These are nothing more than fairy tales on the whole. People are often polygamous and often sexually active outside of marriage. These are trivial truths that need not be hidden. Once again, deception can only lead to distrust and mystification.

Knowledge leads to increased understanding and comfort. Misinformation leads to confusion and a frantic search for a new source of knowledge. Why create this latter situation? I am convinced that the only reason we would mislead our youths about the issue of sex is due to our own immaturity. We are uncomfortable talking about sex despite the alleged maturity adults are supposed to magically acquire by the age of thirty. Children are not uncomfortable when talking about sex—they have not yet sunk to that immaturity level. Let us not allow them to sink that low, and let us satisfy their thirst for knowledge on all subjects.

22 comments:

don said...

I get so pissed off when I see parents shielding their kid's eyes and ears from things like swear words or r-rated movies. What the hell is the point? It's like trying to hide the real world from their kids, or postpone the inevitable. If you think the world is so fuckin' bad that you have to hide it from your kids, don't have kids in the first place!

Solace said...

Gotta love our puritanical roots. It's ok to watch peoples limbs getting hacked off and give the movie a pg-13 rating but show a penis and woah... call the FCC

wookiehobbit said...

Cuz they wanna raise pussies.

Outlightened said...

I believe that parents are not protecting their children from such material, but, rather, protecting their own ethos, in a sense. There are few things that separate children from parents, and one of those things is sex. Sex is "off-limits" to children because of the apprehension that parents have to confront as their children are maturing. Once a child experiences sex, in any form, questions arise. These questions arre often interpreted by parents as a threat; a sort of rebellion. As far as exposure goes, I think that children should be taught formally about sex, not by their father showing little Jimmy a porn magazine. If there is formal education for sex, then less giggling will occur among the youth when the topic of sex is discussed.

little angel said...

i second that outlightened. Both parents and children should be educated about sex. Parents should learn that its not right to hide and not talk about it cuz they will create a sort of "taboo" for the children and thus this giggling thing and shyness will be developed when they hear the word sex.

Dinotoo said...

It's hard to blame the parents because they too were raised by sexually repressed parents who were taught that sex was shameful and something not to be talked about in polite company. But I'm sure everything will be alright now that the President has suggested that young people should "Just say no" to premarital sex. It worked so well for Nancy Reagan and drugs.

Maya said...

Good points made by everyone. But then again, out of all the parents who don't discuss sex with their kids... how many of these kids end up having sexual problems when they grow up? I think there is a time for everything. Kids don't need to talk about sex until they are old enough to understand it. This isn't to say that it should be taboo. Questions should be answered when asked. But there is no need to "liberate" kids and tell them things they may not want to hear until later anyway. When asked, tell them. If not, let it come naturally. Worst case scenario, they'll figure it out in sex ed at school! LOL!
What we need to seriously focus on is educating our kids about SAFE sex, once they can understand it. "Saying NO to premarital sex", I agree with dinotoo is so unrealistic. However saying "YES" to condoms... now that seems more accesible. In Europe, they have had huge campaigns about condoms, they have been pretty succesful. I think we should follow that example.

Singing For Him said...

Just out of curiousity, how many of you are parents? It's a whole new ball game when you are dealing with your own child. Myself, I was raised in a family that never spoke of Sex... Ever! I have done all I can to be open with my children about sex. If they have questions I will answer them. I just want to offer a suggestion though. Have you ever thought that the reason the children or the parents have difficulty with the discusion of sex is more a matter of modesty? It's just a thought.

PlaysWithSquirels said...

Just because today most people aren't virgins on thier wedding night doesn't mean that it's something we should just accept and embrace. Number one, that's a really stupid reason to do anything, just because it's the norm. And how can you give that impression to your kids?!? That's ok to have more than one partner and so forth. What will you do when your daughter becomes the town slut? Pat her on the back?!?

And why shouldn't parents sheild their kids eyes? What you see in the movies isn't necessarily the "real world." How often have you seen a guys arm get chopped off walking down a street? And the way sex is portrayed in movies isn't necessarily what sex is supposed to be either.

T said...

Thank you all for making me feel so damn lucky. I had the sex talk at 10 years old. Then again I wasn't allowed to watch Faces of Death. My mother passed away when I was 14 so I never got have an adult conversation with her about sex. I wish she was alive now so we could dish about how some guys will never learn how to give good head or how this guy I dated had the smallest penis in the world! I am not a parent, but I did raise my sister, 8 years my junior. I know how it feels to have to have "the talk" and how hard it is for me to accept that at 19 and a college student, she is becoming sexually active. I did what I know best. I told her to get hers. I told her every woman DESERVES a vibrator, because every man won't get it done. I told her that she MUST use protection, she MUST see a gynocologist and if she is going to give she better be good at it or tarnish my good name. (I am kidding on this last point.) Nonetheless, if you are going to teach a kid to piss in a toilet you should teach young adults the other uses for their "private" parts.

PlaysWithSquirels said...

How can you tell your sister that kind of stuff?? No guy is interested in a gurl like that for anything long term. He doesn't know where she's been, and he doesn't care! He's just looking to get off and go home. Then where's your sister? Plus, you don't know what those guys might have, and it's not like they care about whether or not your sister gets it.

You treat sex like it's just a way to feel good. It's something to be shared with someone. For your own sake at least take it seriously, cause some day you may meet a guy you like and he'll take it seriously, then decide he doesn't want to see the gurl the rest of the town already has.

And even if you don't take it seriously yourself, at least don't pass that same mentality on to your sister.

Anonymous said...

PlaysWithSquirels
"No guy is interested in a gurl like that for anything long term."

Guys do settle down and marry girls even if they have had multiple partners in the past. What you're saying is a lie told to Christian girls to keep them "pure." The fact is most Christians do sleep around, but they hide it. Nonreligious people sleep around and don't hide it. That's the only difference. As long as someone uses birth control and condoms they aren't doing any harm.

Puritanical views about sex do so much harm. Do you know that the Bible Belt has the highest divorce rate in the nation. Why? Well, to avoid having sex before marriage people marry very young. Most are then divorced before they reach their mid twenties. Wouldn't responsible premarital sex be preferable to early marriage and divorce?

Interestingly enough, atheists and agnostics have lower divorce rates than all the major religious groups. And this is from a study done by a born again christian.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm

wrestlingstud135 said...

I beg to differ on your theory. For the most part "kids", which include teens, are not always driven by the "unknown." For us, it isn't the lack of knowing what it is. If that is the case why do so many continue? It's more of today's outlook on sex. This day an age, we hear nothing but sex this and sex that. Sex is fun, sex is for when you are in love, sex will bring you closer... sex sex sex. So of course with this outlook of society, when two kids, hormonally overloaded, have a close relationship they believe it is right and important to have sex because the closeness and intimacy shown all around them. This is the main strive that gets teens started on sex.

Now, I do agree with you saying we should be honest with our kids about it; be honest that they should wait. Tell them what it is meant for, one person. Sex is not a life. Sex life is an oxymoron. If you live your life by sex, look at all the diseases that are caught EVERY day. Sex, in its truest form, sex is a form of reproduction. IT is meant for ONE person. It is meant for two people so close, they are one in marriage and can actually raise children. Yea there are many multiple sex partner relationships, which our kids will find out about, but must know it's wrong.

In summary, we must be open to our kids about what sex is, and what it is for. It is for two people in marriage, ONLY two people in marriage. When they get older let them know the realities of having a "sex life"; disease, heartache, and often unfaithfulness.

WM said...

wrestlingstud135,
I don't agree. Parents should teach their kids to have responsible sexual relationships. They should teach their kids about condoms and birth control.

I agree that parents should encourage their children to wait. Personally, I don't think teenagers should have sex because I don't think they have the maturity to handle the responsibilities that come with it. But parents must be honest with themselves. Most people will have sex before they marry. Even among kids who pledge to wait for marriage, 88% will have sex beforehand.

Waiting for marriage was fine in the old days when most people were married in their teens. However, early marriage is no longer a good idea. 95% of people of marry in their teens or early twenties will divorce. Healthy sexual relationships are better emotionally than trying to suppress our natural sexual desires.

http://discussreligion.tripod.com

PlaysWithSquirels said...

In a way i kind of agree with WM. The way our society is set up it basically forces us to stay home longer if we have any chance at getting a reasonable job. This in turn means marriage at a younger age is a bad idea, and anyone who is to wait till marriage has to wait longer then in "the older days." But still i beleive waiting till marriage is best.

I have some issues with your numbers WM. Assuming that your 95% is correct, it still doesn't say anything about the people who waited till marriage to start a sexual relationship. There are most likely people included in that number who had sex before marriage, and there are probably people who have waited longer to get married and still didn't have sex.

wrestlingstud135 said...

Yea, in this society people waiting to get married is common. There are also those we get married and still make it through college and things. It does make it much harder now-a-days to stay pure. It's still a thing I hold strong against. I do not believe we should teach kids, me included, how to have sex safe. We should teach them to not have it at all. If we tell them you can't, but if you do use this. Then we are not instilling in them what needs to be instilled, which is waiting. If we do that, tell them no and then how to do it safe, that is pure hypocracy. Teach them to wait. Teach them to find one person, the one they are going to be with for the rest of their life and wait till they get married. If anything it would slow the spread of disease that runs so rampid through these sex lifes that most think are so great. I've watched so many people get torn apart because of the sex life. Wait.

babybear3333 said...

Ummm...Do you have children wrestlingstud135? I do, and I also had the 'talk' from my mother about sex which gave me very little useful information about the subject...lol...My view of sex is that it is why we are all here after all. I've spent almost 20 years learning what I like and about my own body...Telling young adults not to do sex is very wrong, sex is a very personal act and imposing views isn't the answer. That's why most of us have hang-ups about it. Giving them the information and confidence to enjoy it at the appropriate time for them is the right way :)

PlaysWithSquirels said...

Hello!!! That's what we've been saying the whole time babybear! That sex is a good thing at the appropriate time, the only difference is i assume that you don't agree with our deffinition of the "appropriate time." Lol, and i can tell you that i don't have children at least, but when i do i'm not going to instill in them this do what i say, to hell with what i do philosophy. If i'm to tell my kids to wait till marriage, then i better do it to.

xanadian said...

Okay, again, massive opinion here based solely on what I have observed in life.

One. Teaching abstinence is logical because it is the number one way to prevent STDs and pregnancy. We have a saying in the computer industry. The most secure computer on the network is the one that is not connected to the network. Period.

Two. Teaching abstinence is fine, but forcing it--or creating a stigma--can instill a sense of rebellion or create other psychological problems. If you specifically tell your kid "no," then maybe they'll listen and maybe they will not. What I can say is this. I was an officer in the Navy, and I saw what can happen to those who are restrained from doing things for months on end. You cannot drink on board a US Navy vessel. Therefore, the younger sailors (and several of the older sailors and officers) will go out and get into trouble when they go into port. It's called being "pent up". Now, we had a sister ship in the Royal Canadian Navy. They limit the amount of alcohol they could have on board (technically, in the US Navy, you are allowed one beer after 180 days), but you could still have it. Fewer alcohol-related incidents with those men and women. Why? Because it is in our nature to want to do our own thing and rebel. How do you generally feel when someone tells you "don't do that"?

In the end, what is important is to teach your kids self-responsibility. Tell them it is unwise to have sex outside of marriage; but if they do to take the proper precautions. Tell them what could happen if they don't wait until marriage. And I mean both the good AND the bad. Allow them to make their own decision. They're not stupid.

In fact, teaching your kid about self-responsibility in all aspects of life is a good idea. I don't think enough people take responsibility for their own actions. We like to blame someone/something else.

Okay, now I'm digressing.

ioio said...

Great Blog! Ilike it.I have Site where you can Find sex partnerTake a look if you have a minute. Thanks and have a good one!

Goldilocks said...

Well, it is not my comment, but I found a song that fits the post on
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5916029608588883276

Anonymous said...

Very cool design! Useful information. Go on! Baytown chrysler cholesterol maladies Bathroom makeovers cabinets allegra Rv refrigerator ice makers Downloads phone residential service voip gmc canada africa travel Manual for hp 1040 fax golf resorts Upstate ny babes Top ten hotest gay boys